Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Audius
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 32 → 58 (+26)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 426514352
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-14T23:15:51.980Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 68FGkBHqLaAiBuETGBZhKTtbuDtKMHkSfNCg4kcETaA7
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1494 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:15:51.875Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"783e4b94-9c36-46a8-b071-ef7fc56191b5","new_score":58,"page_slug":"audius","prev_score":32,"reason":"All six claim_findings were independently supported with no disputed claims (disputed_pct = 0%). The calibration review establishes that Audius is a legitimate, still-operating decentralized music protocol backed by top-tier institutional investors, with no fraud, no SEC action, and no exit-scam indicators. The sole material incident — the July 23, 2022 treasury exploit (claim_findings[0] and [1]) — was perpetrated by an external attacker exploiting a storage-collision bug; the team patched the vulnerability within 87 minutes. Placing a hack victim with rapid incident response in the WARNING band (20–49), which is reserved for elevated fraud risk or unresolved severe incidents, is a mis-band under the platform's own band semantics. Residual caveats (unresolved NMPA copyright concerns, severe token price decline, and two audits that missed the specific vulnerability) support a mid-CAUTIONARY score of 58 rather than a higher VERIFIED rating, but do not warrant the current WARNING band. The page content is accurate and must remain published; the score delta of +26 moves the score from 32 to the reviewer-recommended 58 (CAUTIONARY).","score_delta":26,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}