Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-27T12:06:30.484Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"8ed8454e-4391-4266-b163-451864833160","new_score":28,"page_slug":"gnosis-pay","prev_score":42,"reason":"Independent recomputation confirms disputed_pct = (3 disputed + 3 unverifiable) / 23 = 26.1%, which falls in the 10-30% band and maps to review_revise with no status change. The page contains two disputed factual claims of real substance: claim_findings[7] asserts the card is unavailable in Latin America while citing sources that place a Gnosis Pay Brazil launch (via Picnic) in April 2025, months before the page's own December 2025 reference point in the same sentence; and claim_findings[5] undercounts total transactions (1.6M vs. Gnosis's own reported 2 millionth payment). claim_findings[20] shows a citation pointing to an article about an unrelated exploit (TesseraDAO) rather than the SquidRouterModule incident it is meant to support, though the underlying wallet/loss figures for that incident were separately corroborated elsewhere (claim_findings[19]). Two stale findings (claim_findings[15], [18]) are excluded from the disputed_pct numerator by definition, but are weighted heavily here: the page repeats 'losses undisclosed' language despite Gnosis's own official post-mortem (final ~$1.8M loss, 5,281 wallets, restoration complete by June 6) having been published before several of the page's own cited sources were archived. Combined with two high-priority coverage gaps -- the missing post-mortem update and the omission of card issuer Monavate's 2026 receivership and subsequent acquisition by Exodus Movement -- these push the score delta toward the top of the applicable band. The three unverifiable items (claim_findings[3], [6], [21]) stem from source access failures (503 errors, inaccessible X posts) rather than established errors and are treated as open questions, not violations. Reviewer confidence of 0.72 and the fact that 11 of 23 claims -- including all core exploit mechanics, corporate registration, and executive quotes -- were fully confirmed keep this within the revise band rather than escalating to under_investigation. The page sits close to the 30% band boundary, but the measured 26.1% does not support crossing it, so no status change or delisting is applied.","score_delta":-14,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}