Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Global Dollar (USDG)
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 68 → 68 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 443524804
- Off-chain at
- 2026-08-27T08:07:12.660Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 9YjgM5zx14DZmangMhYx6oWxpgJqau8nCKPbBg18FiZD
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1490 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-27T08:07:12.511Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"59338f15-dca7-49d1-b4b9-6b4ed44edb9f","new_score":68,"page_slug":"global-dollar","prev_score":68,"reason":"The page's central regulatory claim (Paxos Digital Singapore / MAS) and its GDN membership, reserve-custodian, and NYDFS-consent-order figures are all independently confirmed and precisely stated. However, the page contains a cluster of date and name errors: it misnames USDG's current attestation firm (says Marcum; Paxos's own transparency page says KPMG), gives a wrong year for the SEC's BUSD investigation closure (says 2023; primary sources say 9 July 2024), gives a wrong year for an OKX listing (says June 2026; OKX's own notice says June 2025), gives an incorrect EU-launch year (says 2026; Paxos's own press release says July 2025), and repeats the stale claim (shared with a sibling Paxos page in this review batch) that Paxos Trust Company is NYDFS-supervised when it converted to OCC national trust supervision in December 2025. A market-cap figure is stale by roughly one reporting cycle without an as-of date, and a GENIUS Act 'loophole' claim cites two sources (CLS Blue Sky Blog, Forbes) that in fact discuss Coinbase/Circle's arrangement rather than USDG/Robinhood's, despite being cited as commentary on USDG specifically.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}