Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"cbe170a9efc188a989707ae1993e306e","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T23:25:19.961Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.3333,"investigation_id":"97186db0-8236-479e-9311-19e65b30abae","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":59,"page_slug":"cozy-v2","prev_score":59,"reason":"Of the seven claim findings, one was blocked at the source and is left out of the count. Two of the remaining six are not supported: claim_findings[0] shows the Verichains post-mortem was published on 2025-10-15, not 2025-08-30, and claim_findings[4] (Seattle incorporation) was not found in the cited source. That gives a 33% disputed rate. The core August 2025 exploit facts (date, amount, root cause) are confirmed (claim_findings[2]). However, the page does not mention a second exploit on 2026-09-07 (about $170,000) or the later collapse in total value locked, so its current-status picture is misleading. Reviewer confidence is moderate (0.6), and the Tornado Cash laundering claim could not be checked because its source was blocked, so the penalty stays in the middle of the band and the page is not denied.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":6,"sequence_num":5,"severity_override":{"applied":true,"band":"significant","from_band":"significant","reason":"The review reports a critical omission (a second exploit on 2026-09-07, about $170,000) and a material omission (TVL collapse to about $5k), and subject_status.contradicts_page is true. The percentage band is already significant (2 of 6 scoped findings, 33%), so the omission confirms that band and rules out a lenient reading."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}