Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Apyx Finance (apxUSD)
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 43 → 43 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464370050
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T05:00:47.860Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T05:01:12.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T05:01:12.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- F8dGwzxj4JtcXnGWRo7cabFg6pZCNYQ6AaDZokH33EQj
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1614 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"5d8857cc06381747b1530a9aae9a4d10","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T05:00:47.663Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.5556,"investigation_id":"74096252-df3e-4b84-895d-c347b846e611","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":43,"page_slug":"apyx-finance-apxusd","prev_score":43,"reason":"Five of nine checked claims (about 56%) were disputed or could not be verified. claim_findings[0] and [1] state that no public audit exists, but the reviewer found a public Certora report dated March 2026 that found 11 issues, one of them high severity and fixed. claim_findings[2] and omission_findings[0] show that the page's statement of no large-scale liquidations leaves out reported Morpho liquidations above $4M on June 5. The depeg narrative, funding details and quotes were confirmed, and the reviewer's moderate confidence and the unverified post-June developments (a high-priority coverage gap) keep the penalty in the middle of the band.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"severity_override":{"applied":true,"band":"significant","from_band":"significant","reason":"The review reports two material omissions: a public Certora review the page says does not exist, and Morpho liquidations after the depeg. Both support at least the significant band, which matches the percentage band."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}