Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-27T16:07:11.466Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"906525a5-b86d-4d1f-bfd6-a3c27a894f5d","new_score":38,"page_slug":"taiko-bridge-sgx-key-exploit-june-2026","prev_score":38,"reason":"Of 20 checked claims, 19 were independently confirmed and 1 was rated partially_supported; none were disputed or unverifiable, putting disputed_pct at 0.0%, squarely in the approve band. The reviewer directly fetched the primary technical writeup on the SGX key leak and reproduced exact wallet addresses, transaction hashes, block numbers, state roots, contract addresses, and per-asset drain figures, then cross-checked multiple independent outlets. The page's account of the technical failure, the $1.7M loss breakdown, and the full-restitution recovery timeline all held up. The single flagged issue (claim_findings[17]) is a contextual statistic — a PeckShield bridge-exploit tally that predates and excludes the Taiko incident — which is a framing nuance on background context, not a core allegation, and does not by itself move the page out of the approve range. The coverage gaps the reviewer noted (stablecoin-issuer freeze response, remediation specifics, postmortem tracking, attacker identification, ecosystem impact) are rated medium or low priority, not high, so they fall under 'gaps suggest expansion, not denial' rather than triggering a band change.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}