Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Terence Kwok — Humanity Protocol Staged Hack
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 14 → 2 (-12)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 465098744
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-04T00:22:49.069Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-04T00:23:00.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-04T00:23:00.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- FN8mvvAvtfTMGNE5LfrD41Pr9LFZ8uFJbrVU58sLxL1S
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1754 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"8ac64171e13b08680bdfb1291d7d4851","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-11-04T00:22:48.805Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.1429,"investigation_id":"fcf8176f-b437-467b-93a2-5c44585b6162","judge_def_hash":"750934ecb48272224909b7430fab271676d391380fbc821acbe7ee7e4cac2fa3","new_score":2,"page_slug":"terence-kwok-humanity-protocol-staged-hack","prev_score":14,"reason":"Of 7 claims checked, none were found wrong and 1 (claim_findings[2], the Hancom certificate detail) could not be found in the cited source, giving about 14% disputed or unverifiable, which is the minor-issues band. Three more claims were only partly supported: the Kwok quotation wording (claim_findings[0]), the token mint figures (claim_findings[5]) and the firmness of the DPRK attribution in the timeline (claim_findings[4]). The page also omits material July 2026 developments (omission_findings[0]) and has a high-priority gap in primary sources such as the Quantstamp report and on-chain hashes. The reviewer's confidence was moderate and the checks were limited, so the penalty stays modest.","reviewer_def_hash":"3839668b232611e5b26db72079d64745f8e57e919b8a379e79b44ba4a52c845b","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":3,"severity_override":{"applied":true,"band":"minor","from_band":"minor","reason":"The review reports a material omission (July 2026 enterprise-AI pivot, 'pretty low' recovery odds, law-enforcement contact, new token already issued). The project is still operating, so this does not contradict the page and does not justify a harsher band than minor, but it rules out approval."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}