Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · OLPC / BnbLabubu Token (PancakeSwap Pool Exploit)
- Sequence
- #6
- Score
- 2 → 0 (-12)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464271312
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-01T23:08:12.859Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-01T23:08:40.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-01T23:08:40.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- Exyz4Rqjq3NqcRTP55EsJq3ZDoBtKS8uxE5YwsjExcj3
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1483 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"be2499ff7aba6c012655e6202d269e05","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T23:08:12.544Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.2727,"investigation_id":"d93f8bac-a89c-4acf-9ac0-1ba862a52279","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_slug":"olpc-bnblabubu-token-pancakeswap-pool-exploit","prev_score":2,"reason":"The core facts hold up: the roughly $1.11M loss, the 46-day-earlier decimalsValue change, the Tornado Cash deposit of 633.4 ETH and the PancakeSwap statement are all confirmed by multiple news outlets (claim_findings[0], [1], [4], [8]). Three of 11 claims (about 27%) could not be verified: the attribution of the premeditation view to named security researchers (claim_findings[3]), the 2026-05 renunciation date and dead-address detail on the timeline (claim_findings[9]), and the regulatory status, which is stale as of June 24 (claim_findings[10]). No claim was disputed. The page leans heavily on a rug-pull framing that rests on news reports alone, with no on-chain or auditor source (high-priority coverage gap), so a modest penalty and correction of the weakly sourced attributions are warranted.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":6,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}