Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-18T20:40:49.271Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"960aad20-b4eb-472f-aa41-d2a11da02d25","new_score":55,"page_slug":"astroport","prev_score":42,"reason":"This is a calibration-only adjudication; content accuracy was not in dispute (0% disputed_pct across 15 claim_findings, 0 unhedged_allegation findings, reviewer confidence 0.75). The reviewer's calibration_assessment attributes both major loss events — the May 2022 Terra/Luna ecosystem collapse and the July 2024 IBC hooks reentrancy exploit — as 'suffered' (attribution b), not own-fraud or negligence, and classifies the Terraform Labs SEC fraud liability as third-party/guilt-by-association risk (attribution c) that Astroport's own governance does not control. Per the scoring rubric, an entity whose primary incidents are suffered hacks/ecosystem contagion should not sit in WARNING (20-49); nothing in the review supports an own-fraud finding that would justify the current WARNING/42. I agree with the reviewer's recommendation to move the entity to CAUTIONARY/55 — the lower-middle of the band rather than its top — reflecting genuine non-fraud risk signals the reviewer surfaced (two near-total-value-destruction incidents in three years, thin post-collapse recovery to ~$29M TVL, an operational-hygiene lapse — an outdated ibc-go dependency — behind the 2024 exploit, and an unresolved coverage gap on whether exploit victims were made whole).","score_delta":13,"sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}