Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · HEEBOO
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 54 → 54 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 457675388
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-16T14:44:27.296Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-16T14:44:36.374Z
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 7ixrfdXqgwm12cbS7dykufwECpTNJKFhtNcaCptMNoDU
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (2051 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"e0478d2b67c4dc10c8c348d658e76de1","decided_at":"2026-10-16T14:44:27.050Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.1765,"findings_hash":"ECnpCDYSbbC8RRRBjUqbuvDzRathcted6cMFjp9Xh6WR","investigation_id":"0dac514c-7a57-41e4-8164-d94248f26de2","mode":"findings_only","new_score":54,"page_content_hash":"302c5dd727292a5761363a61ed8d024c74057e7cfd2bc535f79cd9d1be5ae0ec","page_slug":"heeboo","prev_score":54,"reason":"The large majority of this page's factual claims are well supported by the sources it cites, and several are additionally corroborated by independent tier-1 and tier-2 reporting not in the citation list (Variety, The Block, Decrypt, Solana Compass, a Kidscreen Summit bio). The token mechanics in the tokenomics section were verified word-for-word against the live official sale page. Three issues stand out: (1) the claim that the two named founders personally worked at Disney, DreamWorks, Ubisoft, Netflix, Warner Bros, Marvel, and Industrial Light & Magic overstates sourcing that attributes this studio pedigree to the wider Claynosaurz production team, not to the two founders individually; (2) Andrew Pelekis's CFA credential and Nord45/Innovatus employment history could not be verified anywhere, including in one of the two sources cited for that claim; (3) the timeline date for HEEBOO's 'formal introduction' via the cited X post decodes, via the post's public snowflake ID, to approximately October 2025 rather than April 14, 2026, and no independent source places a formal HEEBOO/$HEEBOO unveiling that early. The page's central risk framing (unaudited contract, fully-unlocked treasury allocation, equity-options regulatory gray area) is accurate and was not found to be overstated. The main coverage gap is the absence of any on-chain holder-concentration check, which third-party aggregators flag as a notable red flag for this specific token.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}