Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Sui
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#4
Score
33 → 33 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
426514431
Off-chain at
2026-06-14T23:15:55.955Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
4292Uz5zYejZh6DFi5RN6U4UbFDBGbAAyd7w4Lve8bx4
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1694 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:15:55.887Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"5d6a6e3d-9ec3-45e6-8461-82efc3ea7707","new_score":33,"page_slug":"sui","prev_score":33,"reason":"Blue-chip calibration review (Prompt A). Verdict: over-penalized. Page content is treated as accurate; the trust_score band is miscalibrated. Sui is a legitimate Layer 1 blockchain developed by Mysten Labs (founded by former Meta/Diem engineers, backed by a16z, Coinbase Ventures, and Binance Labs) that launched mainnet in May 2023. The two loss events cited — the $223M Cetus exploit and the $29M individual theft — were suffered by third parties operating on or holding Sui, not perpetrated by Sui/Mysten Labs. In both cases Sui validators took active remedial steps (emergency freeze, governance vote, $30M Foundation recovery loan). The page itself acknowledges the February 2026 spot ETF listing on Nasdaq and SEC engagement, which contradict the WARNING band framing. Unresolved material caveats — low validator count (122 vs Ethereum's 900K+), ongoing token unlock pressure through 2030, unresolved insider-selling allegation (denied but unaudited), weak on-chain analytics infrastructure, and the ZachXBT withdrawal — justify placing Sui in CAUTIONARY (50-69) rather than VERIFIED, but the absence of any fraud, scam, or Ponzi mechanics means WARNING (20-49) over-penalizes a legitimate, institutionally-backed protocol. A score of 57 reflects legitimate operation with material governance/security caveats that a skeptical investor should weigh.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}