Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · JUST
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 32 → 32 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464443077
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T09:21:24.416Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T09:21:46.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T09:21:46.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- ByM2Q3AMZk1tzSdW5YAdBN1KEyga9i8A12owVWwmuDk2
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1433 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"c341f46b9ad73b09c4f302df6899df0b","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T09:21:24.345Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2727,"findings_hash":"GxhHRt7htB4j3i2bZBHz6vrfhqHQu4DoEywWF9Q32dW6","investigation_id":"83202427-0b36-4520-84f8-86091ffe725b","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":32,"omissions":{"material":1,"total":2},"page_content_hash":"cee6d27ddfe79e41db300e44f29546e45c3d9796ca67a70ea5cc6b536ef187ae","page_slug":"just-jst","prev_score":32,"reason":"Core news items (the $10M Rainberry settlement, Sun's WLFI suit, the PeckShield-flagged BNB movement, the '100x' remark) are real, but the page states Sun still faces SEC charges when the cited source says claims against him would be dismissed. It also misstates the WLFI investment ($75M versus $45M), gives an untraceable $700M figure, presents an unconfirmed rug pull as established, and leaves the August 2020 launch date and 'first lending platform' claim unsupported. The congressional letter could not be read. The project remains operating.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":11,"sequence_num":2,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}