Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · ORAMAMA Token ($ORAMAMA)
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 3 → 3 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 463289234
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-30T12:42:31.913Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-30T12:42:50.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-30T12:42:50.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 9RHefV3oZqoABWwuPCoovRnpXALeT9cGrbpBp3c6SqFF
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1322 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"2649d5e196b1cfc4af5059b68bc1bac3","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-30T12:42:31.860Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0,"findings_hash":"81Xk3joFC6P9XBMGz8nxw3tJxoeprfgdz4t8iAaUBeNX","investigation_id":"9cbb3911-3cfc-4e09-be09-ac868908e4e7","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":3,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"3408c679cfe78433c4ba5c0ce7e4bcb67d04d00af2525286068d96169073c0d7","page_slug":"oramama-token-oramama","prev_score":3,"reason":"The page carefully hedges its claims and the core assertions (Feb 22 promotion, about ten accounts, six-figure profits, the AI persona and user ID, the nation-state remark) match ZachXBT's thread and Cointelegraph. Problems are a dead Coinpedia URL used in several places, a Nikita Bier claim that neither readable source supports, and a blocking claim that I could not verify. No current-status contradiction was found for the token.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":7,"sequence_num":2,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}