Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · TesseraDAO
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 2 → 2 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425432460
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-10T00:01:09.986Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 24iufJdyVSo8uTRi9x5HMLXHfzukRAQnzUKX4xjPTQzU
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1062 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-10T00:01:09.862Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"dd1085e9-036b-43c6-a646-59908eb5bd44","new_score":2,"page_slug":"tesseradao","prev_score":2,"reason":"The TesseraDAO page is substantially accurate on its core factual claims — the exploit date, token amount minted, attacker address, ETH laundered, and project silence are all corroborated by multiple independent sources. The most material error is the present-tense characterization of Tornado Cash as an OFAC-sanctioned tool, which has been factually stale since March 21, 2025 when OFAC officially delisted it. Several secondary claims (specific MultiTransfer function detail, PeckShield's explicit endorsement of the insider hypothesis, the $340.7M figure as a June-only vs. year-to-date total) are partially supported but mildly overstated. No claims were found to be actively disputed by credible counter-sources.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}