Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review_revise · ADI
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#3
Score
5240 (-12)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
443525372
Off-chain at
2026-08-27T10:41:47.403Z
Anchored at
Block time

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
2qQ6R4JozReH3JfRdgzNoNwMor1dJTZRCPK1euPw1kue
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1536 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-27T10:41:46.872Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"e36bc4fb-c345-47a7-90ff-9cb2f57d28c5","new_score":40,"page_slug":"adi","prev_score":52,"reason":"Of 33 checked claims, 25 were confirmed and the page's most serious allegations about ADI Foundation figures and Predictstreet's regulatory history held up under independent checking. Two claims were disputed because the page contradicts its own cited sources: the tokenomics allocation table (claim_findings[8]) does not match the official ADI Foundation documentation it cites and doesn't add up to 100%, and the stated all-time-high price and date (claim_findings[24]) is contradicted by the page's own CoinGecko source, which shows a higher price reached earlier. Two additional claims were unverifiable, one because a source (Bybit) returned an error during checking rather than because the underlying fact was found false (claim_findings[26]), and one because an absence could not be conclusively confirmed (claim_findings[23]). At 12.1% disputed-or-unverifiable, the page sits in the low end of the range that calls for revision rather than removal, but two high-priority gaps flagged by the reviewer -- the tokenomics mismatch and missing post-launch Predictstreet concerns -- and a stale IHC market-cap figure argue for a correction pass before the page is considered fully settled.","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}