Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · HypurrFi Domain Hijack (April 2026)
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 62 → 57 (-5)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 424382937
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-05T03:54:08.777Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- PCGjDcaZ9WuzaPpPCJ8FQzB3hV1z1TQNbPYdcVgQuxF
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1374 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-05T03:54:08.329Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"d6f710cc-1241-439e-a06f-cea33478dad8","new_score":57,"page_slug":"hypurrfi-domain-hijack-april-2026","prev_score":62,"reason":"The reviewer assessed 23 claims and found 16 confirmed, 5 partially supported, 1 unverifiable, and 0 disputed, yielding a disputed_pct of 4.3% — well within the approval band. The core incident narrative (April 3 domain hijack via Openprovider social engineering, no funds drained, frontend migration, domain recovery) is confirmed by multiple independent sources. The five partially-supported findings are limited to verbatim quote attribution and minor timeline date precision, not material factual errors. The sole unverifiable claim — an approximately $180 million peak TVL figure in claim_findings[5] — lacks any corroborating source and is inconsistent with available data points ($8.47M in March 2025, ~$15.9M during wind-down); this is flagged as a high-priority coverage gap and warrants removal or explicit sourcing on the next revision, but it is a secondary supporting clause rather than a core allegation. A small score penalty is applied to reflect this unsupported quantitative claim.","score_delta":-5,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}