Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-26T21:07:51.082Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"db6fb986-b932-485a-a2cd-5324325fb39a","new_score":8,"page_slug":"overhere-clinton-so","prev_score":18,"reason":"Of 41 checked claims, 34 were confirmed, 2 disputed, and 4 unverifiable, giving a disputed_pct of 14.6% -- within the minor-to-moderate revision range, not a denial-level failure. The page correctly applies the named-individual standard: it describes only a pending civil class action rather than a criminal indictment, adds no unsourced background about Clinton So, and keeps the SEC's clearance of Haliey Welch properly separate from So's and OverHere's ongoing civil exposure (claim_findings[40]). Two substantive errors were found: a $3.3 million figure is presented as the peak-price value of a 17% token allocation when the underlying source describes it as proceeds early backers realized by selling, which changes what the figure tells a reader about insider extraction (claim_findings[19]); and a related case's docket number is given as 1:24-cv-08965 where four independent legal-docket sources show 1:24-cv-08695 (claim_findings[25]). Additional minor defects -- a placeholder amended-complaint date (claim_findings[29]), a mismatched archive snapshot, and two inline citations missing from the source list -- support a revise-with-corrections outcome rather than approval, and a high-priority conflict with a sibling page over which statute and collapse percentage apply to the same lawsuit is noted for editorial correction since this process has no mechanism to merge or cross-link pages.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}