Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Anza
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 74 → 74 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 423507968
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-01T03:12:27.924Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 6jvDCsfZ34RpCErjvAust7dsSLAxsU9nqMgaeb7QMd4Z
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1180 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-01T03:12:27.767Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"83fa375e-fe5d-4d90-8113-e50091f2a566","new_score":74,"page_slug":"anza","prev_score":74,"reason":"The Anza investigation page is largely accurate and well-sourced, with all major claims confirmed or partially confirmed by credible sources. Three notable inaccuracies were identified: (1) the Funding section incorrectly states Anza has not disclosed its funding source, when a Solana Foundation grant was publicly confirmed by the CEO at launch; (2) Agave 3.0 is described as 'released to testnet in late 2025' when it was in fact recommended for full mainnet deployment in October 2025; and (3) Rotor is characterized as 'replacing' Turbine when Anza's own documentation frames it as a refinement with Turbine remaining in the initial deployment. No claims were found to be actively disputed by credible counter-sources. The 86% Agave-derived stake figure is slightly stale for the 'late 2025' timeframe given rapid Frankendancer growth.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}