Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Mr. Parveen India Social Engineering Scam Ring
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 2 → 0 (-20)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464294265
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T00:30:12.991Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T00:30:33.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T00:30:33.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 9qgiBCJw7wMHSZscKkorc7i6yYv2nSndeno7d9gpGqjJ
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1499 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"e5d8cfdee0b0fb6db2e08e3b5f526e77","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T00:30:12.765Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.4167,"investigation_id":"9d69e5d6-dc4c-4464-b07f-684de687bfcf","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_slug":"mr-parveen-india-social-engineering-scam-ring","prev_score":2,"reason":"The core account (the 5.7357 BTC Changelly freeze, the account deletion, no Changelly comment) is confirmed by readable sources, but 5 of the 11 scoreable claims could not be found in any readable source (claim_findings[6], [7], [10], [11], [12]), a rate of about 45%. These include the 'consciousness of guilt' characterisation and the 'medium confidence' rating, both of which bear on how an alleged individual is portrayed. One finding (claim_findings[3], the disclosed addresses) was left out of the rate because the source was blocked, and the primary ZachXBT post, CryptoTimes and NullTX could not be read. The reviewer's confidence is moderate (0.5) and the page hedges its claims as allegations, so the penalty sits in the lower-middle of the band and the page is not denied.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-20,"scored_claims":12,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}