Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-26T07:06:20.831Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"e045ecc6-65b7-40c1-9c52-77ca12ab20a3","new_score":20,"page_slug":"stakedao","prev_score":38,"reason":"The core exploit reporting on this page holds up well: the deployer-key compromise, the LayerZero setPeer reconfiguration, the ~5.44 trillion vsdCRV mint, and the ~$91,000 extraction are all strongly corroborated, and the page correctly avoids overstating Curve Finance's role as anything more than a swap venue and warning party. The mechanical disputed rate is low (about 3.7%), but the substance is worse than that number suggests: the page still tells readers that StakeDAO has not published a post-mortem and that the compensation timeline for affected users is unresolved, when StakeDAO in fact published a post-mortem and completed compensation for 242 affected addresses by July 9, 2026 -- roughly seven weeks before this review. One of these claims is not merely outdated but directly contradicted by a source dated before the page's own stated cutoff. Because this leaves readers with a materially inaccurate impression of an unresponsive, non-transparent team on a question central to judging the protocol's trustworthiness, and because the page also omits current TVL and operating status while still making claims about current state, the page needs revision and a closer look before its transparency narrative can be treated as current. A misattributed quote and one dead secondary link add further reason to return it for updates rather than accept it as-is.","score_delta":-18,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}