Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Hypurr NFTs
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 42 → 42 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 443509460
- Off-chain at
- 2026-08-19T16:40:05.754Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- AG3Gxfur7pooZSzZU5hJy6TxdH1A7shQdQ8WNDTSSKuP
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1241 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-19T16:40:05.696Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"a11c7577-4338-477d-8f85-f61ec2de41f6","new_score":42,"page_slug":"hypurr-nfts","prev_score":42,"reason":"The page's core claims — the legitimate 4,600-piece Hyper Foundation airdrop and the ZachXBT-flagged $400K theft of 8 NFTs from compromised individual wallets — are well corroborated across multiple independent outlets and are accurately hedged (the page correctly frames the collection as a victim/context, not a perpetrator, and hedges the HyperVault item as 'allegedly'). No unhedged allegations or contradicted claims were found. Weaknesses are ones of precision and completeness rather than falsity: several dates in the timeline (HyperVault Sept 26 vs. Sept 28 stated; floor-price settlement Sept 29 vs. Oct 1 stated) are slightly off from the cited sources, one dollar figure ($62M 24h volume) rests on a single lower-credibility source the reviewer could not access, and the page's body `sections` are entirely empty, leaving only the summary and timeline to carry the page's substance.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}