Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Leap Wallet
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 62 → 62 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 443513028
- Off-chain at
- 2026-08-25T09:04:35.900Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- E6N2ctHgQHxq5hrZwWqb3cgMH7xfBsXsupdPhEMbxbvQ
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1082 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-25T09:04:35.679Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"01cb5f02-6492-421b-95ca-fdfb1fe32127","new_score":62,"page_slug":"leap-wallet","prev_score":62,"reason":"The page's core narrative (Leap Wallet's Terra origins, $3.2M/CoinFund-Pantera funding, Cosmos pivot, and April-May 2026 shutdown with the stated product list and quotes) is well corroborated by primary and independent secondary sources. Three claims are disputed: a mischaracterized/partly-fabricated Crypto Times quote attributing 'financial exhaustion' language specifically to Leap that does not appear in the source, an Atomic Wallet citation for phishing-safety warnings that the cited article does not actually contain, and a founder-location claim (Vancouver, BC) that conflicts with other credible aggregators listing Singapore. A handful of figures (300,000-user timing, use-of-funds detail) are only loosely or self-sourced.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}