Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Indexed Finance
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 12 → 4 (-8)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464356743
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T04:13:27.235Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T04:13:41.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T04:13:41.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 7MDSk85GYGASDcScdtyRZih42xCE4K8n75LJ58qkzByd
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1964 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"6dd09fcddf8d8b57af32cc48d1aa1d7d","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T04:13:27.018Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0,"investigation_id":"498c6cce-b440-47b8-b117-f20dc3bd6c66","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":4,"page_slug":"indexed-finance","prev_score":12,"reason":"Every claim finding the reviewer checked is either confirmed or only partly supported. The indictment counts, the 90-year maximum and the December 2021 Canadian warrant match the DOJ release and Coingeek (claim_findings[0], [1]). The remaining issues are small: Proposal 26/27 details could not be confirmed in the cited Cointelegraph article (claim_findings[2]). The KyberSwap figure of $49-50M is slightly above the roughly $48M that other sources give (claim_findings[4]). One archive link points to an unrelated ProShares article (claim_findings[5]). The page also leaves out Medjedovic's 2024 Serbian arrest and release, which the reviewer rated a material omission (omission_findings[0]). That omission, not the claim percentage, drives a minor penalty. The reviewer's confidence was moderate and several technical details were not individually re-fetched.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-8,"sequence_num":3,"severity_override":{"applied":true,"band":"minor","from_band":"approve","reason":"The review reports a material omission: Medjedovic's 2024 arrest in Serbia on a Dutch European arrest warrant, 105 days in custody, and release after a Belgrade court denied extradition. The page covers the Serbia dragnet but not this episode, so the claim-level percentage understates the gap. The subject status does not contradict the page, so the minor band is enough."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}