Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review_revise · Amnokgang Technology Development Company
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#3
Score
0 → 0 (-8)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
426294783
Off-chain at
2026-06-13T23:03:00.103Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
Ct7wAK8GobvMz3eejDrzKDBaFQgsvbmZvKqtdV2eCkhg
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1162 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-13T23:02:59.794Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"43d19c56-214d-420f-9471-04ff41a65e54","new_score":0,"page_slug":"amnokgang-technology-development-company","prev_score":0,"reason":"23 of 29 claims were confirmed against Tier 1 and Tier 2 sources, with all seven designated cryptocurrency addresses exactly matching OFAC SDN data via OpenSanctions. However, claim_findings[5] identifies a material legal error: the page attributes Amnokgang's designation to Executive Order 13722, while multiple secondary sources covering the same Treasury action (sb0416) consistently state EO 13810 as the operative authority. This is flagged as a high-priority coverage gap. Two claims regarding per-worker earnings up to $300,000 (claim_findings[12] and claim_findings[28]) could not be confirmed in the cited sources, though the figure is consistent with broader DOJ/FBI advisories. The page is well-sourced overall and requires targeted correction rather than broad revision.","score_delta":-8,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}