Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Daos.fun
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
42 → 42 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
423652995
Off-chain at
2026-06-01T19:11:52.564Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
CQYmaT3n7aACssR1doTQJmeQ2n5A5ruzcB17tDk2hsuf
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1285 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-01T19:11:52.489Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"5d26f0bb-3afb-4dfe-81f0-b359d5ee5c90","new_score":42,"page_slug":"daosfun","prev_score":42,"reason":"The daos.fun investigation is factually solid on its core claims: the launch date, founder identity, custody model mechanics, NAV-to-market-cap premiums, and the AICC/Bankless incident are well-supported by verifiable sources. Key accuracy concerns are: (1) the V3 launch date is placed at March 2025 but evidence points to November 2024; (2) the Founder DAOs timeline entry appears off by approximately 4 months; (3) the ai16z section omits the token's true all-time high of $2.66 billion (January 2025) and the subsequent $AI16Z-to-$ELIZAOS migration; (4) the page does not disclose the April 2026 federal class action against ai16z/ElizaOS creators, which is directly relevant context for the platform's flagship DAO. The @pmairca attribution to Shaw Walters conflates an AI persona character with the creator's identity. Regulatory risk framing does not account for the materially reduced enforcement environment under the Atkins-era SEC.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}