Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Polygon
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 62 → 62 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 424319271
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-04T20:51:00.605Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 2faGhND4i83xq4LGruoB4ovQUK85UdijGjxF72sqJbRS
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1095 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-04T20:51:00.503Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"6727e512-e9d3-4569-9b3c-43e919eba256","new_score":62,"page_slug":"polygon","prev_score":62,"reason":"The page is broadly accurate on core facts (founding team, IEO, rebrand, vulnerability details, token migration, layoffs, and acquisitions), but contains two material errors: the ChainArgos analysis date is stated as 'early 2023' and the timeline marks it '2023-03-01' when the primary source (ChainArgos Medium post) was published January 15, 2024; and the Discord breach section erroneously states no user funds were stolen, directly contradicting the cited CryptoSlate source which documents ~$145,000-$150,000 in ETH losses. Two cited URLs returned 404 errors (CoinTelegraph MATIC SEC article, CoinTelegraph ChainArgos magazine article). The Mihailo Bjelic departure in May 2025 and the disputed scale of January 2026 layoffs are notable omissions.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}