Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Bernie Madoff
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 0 → 0 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 426522825
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-15T00:12:01.933Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 35CJJuxLiMUeW1z67vo3oyKg8vaJGDSRQfB6gsoEhGeC
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1362 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-15T00:12:01.650Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"675a8bfd-f408-4d21-a128-8cb42dd4d07f","new_score":0,"page_slug":"bernie-madoff","prev_score":0,"reason":"The review examined 40 claims and found only 1 outright disputed (claim_findings[44]: Do Kwon sentencing date listed as December 1, 2025 when confirmed sources establish December 11, 2025 — a 10-day timeline error). The disputed_pct of 2.5% falls well within the 0-10% approval band. Ten claims are partially_supported, but none concern the page's core allegations about Madoff's fraud, prosecution, or sentencing; the inaccuracies are limited to peripheral figures (client account count off by ~100, recovery rate understated by ~3 percentage points, Scaramucci's title misdescribed, a verbatim DOJ quote not independently verified verbatim). Two FBI press release URLs returned 403 errors (link rot), but in both cases the underlying facts were independently confirmed by Tier 1 government sources. The one high-priority coverage gap — a deeper structural mapping of Madoff patterns to crypto market risks — is an editorial expansion suggestion, not a factual deficiency warranting denial or revision status.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}