Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · JELLY
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 62 → 62 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 462278772
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-28T00:46:52.617Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-28T00:47:17.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-28T00:47:17.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- wYvjttyptnrvEaJ8Xr7iEbT5o3rKjcAhxJ4HT3EeuBE
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1398 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"29e85a6f3508d9a514bf8d93776cf660","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-28T00:46:52.408Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.2,"investigation_id":"a8402da3-b8e2-4106-9e39-00f3c9ebd6e6","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":62,"page_slug":"jelly","prev_score":62,"reason":"The core incident account (wallet sizes, $7.17M deposit, 429% pump, $6.26M withdrawn, $13.5M peak unrealized loss, $0.0095 settlement) was confirmed against Arkham, Halborn, CoinDesk and Decrypt. Of 10 scored claims, 2 could not be verified (claim_findings[6] two-minute quorum timing, claim_findings[10] Binance non-response), 20%, which falls in the minor band. Several claims are only partly supported, notably the 2,800x launch multiple (claim_findings[1]; Decrypt reports about 13.8x), the short-entry-price coincidence (claim_findings[7]) and the OKX listing (claim_findings[9]). One claim (claim_findings[8]) was not scored because its source blocked the reviewer. No shutdown, sanction or material omission was found.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":10,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}