Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T02:46:16.979Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"dc5c1b46-fb92-4f75-a9f4-bc35f44790d2","new_score":28,"page_slug":"bridgers-cross-chain-swap","prev_score":38,"reason":"The page's central allegation — that BlockWatchdog identified Bridgers' Ethereum payout contract as the on-chain link between the TRON and Ethereum legs of the $8.07 million Coinsbuy hack — holds up and is well corroborated across multiple independent outlets (claim_findings[1]). However, the review surfaced several secondary accuracy problems: the page calls BlockWatchdog a 'blockchain intelligence firm' when every independently checked source calls it a 'blockchain investigator,' overstating its institutional standing (claim_findings[2]); the page attributes a ChangeNOW fund freeze to an entity called 'Specter Investigations' that appears in none of its cited sources and may be an invented or upgraded name for an individual analyst referred to elsewhere only as 'Specter' (claim_findings[5]); the page cites a source for 'Node Capital' as an investor that does not actually mention Node Capital (claim_findings[9]); and the page's $8.07M loss figure, while internally consistent with its own sources, is not reconciled against a cluster of outlets reporting $7.9M (claim_findings[12]). None of these affect the core allegation against Bridgers, but together they warrant correction before the page is treated as fully settled. Note: the reviewer's summary block undercounts findings (12 claims / 7 confirmed) versus the 13 entries actually present in claim_findings (8 confirmed); this verdict is based on the authoritative 13-entry array, under which disputed+unverifiable claims are roughly 15% of total, consistent with the reviewer's own reported disputed_pct of 0.17 and squarely in the minor-issues band.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}