Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T18:14:48.699Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"7ba6b807-a58d-48b7-89b5-80d4d46be546","new_score":2,"page_slug":"catfi-memecoin-catfi","prev_score":2,"reason":"Recomputing the reviewer's own claim_findings array (14 entries, not the summary block's mistaken count of 13) gives a disputed rate of 1/14, about 7%, which sits well inside the approve range. The only disputed claim (claim_findings[7]) is that the Virtual Asset User Protection Act took effect July 1, 2024; two Tier 1 sources place the effective date at July 19, 2024. That is an eighteen-day error on a statute's commencement date, not on any allegation against a person, and it does not touch the page's central claims. The two partially_supported findings (claim_findings[8] and claim_findings[11]) involve a dead citation and an overstated 'jurisdictional precedent' framing, but in both cases the reviewer independently confirmed the underlying facts are true through other sources -- these are sourcing and phrasing issues, not falsehoods. Critically, the reviewer confirms the page does not conflate this CATFI token with an unrelated same-named defunct BSC token, and that the core narrative -- the Park/'Eth Father' prosecution, the roughly 900 million won loss across 256 victims, the May 2026 arrests, the indictment, and the July 23, 2026 sentencing -- is consistently corroborated across independently checked sources. Three coverage gaps were logged, none rated high priority, including a deliberate reviewer judgment that the missing on-chain contract address is a gap in the underlying press record rather than a defect unique to this page; per the reviewer's own calibration, that does not warrant escalation.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}