Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
- Sequence
- #5
- Score
- 0 → 0 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464262244
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-01T22:36:06.662Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-01T22:36:15.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-01T22:36:15.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- BufCCgqGWjDX8YB2BEgXonj8RHTHpdP5kWAx7fzMaRhT
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1459 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"23f044fc326463989b4ea28044d0d002","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T22:36:06.584Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2,"findings_hash":"8Xqy8scUsbPxMnpb9w7tpF8ohRBZrhoh8UKJuPiXUNEc","investigation_id":"93c361f5-3120-4191-bbf7-1dd0d214cf18","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"omissions":{"material":1,"total":2},"page_content_hash":"93e14e683ce20b00714c2506b85db92b57403d02efbc87ec00913ca82bf2cddc","page_slug":"mica-non-compliant-exchange-risk-cluster-post-july-1-2026","prev_score":0,"reason":"The regulatory framing (July 1, 2026 end of the transitional period, ESMA statements, the AscendEX shutdown) is consistent with the reporting I could reach. The Binance section overstates the scope of its EU halt relative to the cited CoinDesk article, omits the reported continued servicing of some EU users and ESMA's challenge to it, and attributes a 40 million EU-account figure that the cited article does not contain. Most other claims were not independently checked in this pass, so the verdict is not a clean bill for them.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":5,"sequence_num":5,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}