Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-13T20:18:09.399Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"ce84ec9f-aae8-4f31-8aec-4fb339bbc913","new_score":18,"page_slug":"okx-dex","prev_score":28,"reason":"The review found zero formally disputed claims, but two high-priority structural problems require correction before the page can be approved. First, claim_findings[13] establishes that the page's description of a 'Three-year compliance monitor' in the DOJ settlement is inaccurate — OKX voluntarily retained a compliance consultant through February 2027; no court-ordered or government-appointed monitor was accepted. This distinction is material to assessing regulatory severity. Second, a high-priority coverage gap notes that all eight analytical page sections contain empty content, meaning the sourced evidence exists but the written body of the page has not been generated. Additionally, claim_findings[1] and claim_findings[7] present the PeckShield $2.7M exploit estimate as the page's sole figure without noting OKX's own confirmed loss of approximately $370K-$430K — a factual qualification readers should have. The major regulatory claims (DOJ settlement amount, Malta FIAU fine, Lazarus laundering, Bybit hack) are confirmed by credible sources including Tier 1 outlets.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}