Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 0 → 0 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 423150261
- Off-chain at
- 2026-05-30T11:47:48.816Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 6stKpatmFjGxffz9E3RCaFBYDuNcqDzaAoTutakfR3fP
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1070 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-05-30T11:47:48.748Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"58625252-4783-49c8-bbb5-d44243a2b444","new_score":0,"page_slug":"uniswap-google-ad-phishing-campaign-may-2026","prev_score":0,"reason":"The investigation page is substantially accurate and well-sourced. The SEAL Radar primary source (credibility tier 1) directly confirms the majority of technical, financial, and operational claims. The main area requiring attention is drainer tool attribution: the page attributes the May 2026 campaign to Inferno Drainer and Vanilla Drainer (drawn from SEAL's March 2026 report), while Protos and CoinGabbar specifically name 'AngelFerno' for the May 2026 @ika_xbt incident and broader campaign — a distinction the page does not address. The enumerated protocol targeting list also omits 1inch (4% per SEAL) while listing smaller targets. No claims were found to be disputed or unverifiable.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}