Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"1ca427f4b7cbbb109c4186592ecc3f6d","band_override":{"actual_delta":-12,"actual_verdict":"review_revise","disputed_pct":0.3,"expected_delta_range":[-30,-15],"expected_verdict":"review_revise","rationale":"Of 10 countable claim findings (one source-blocked finding excluded), 1 was disputed and 2 could not be found in sources, giving 30%, the top of the minor band. The core allegations (charges, counts, penalties, alleged trading pattern, employment) were confirmed by multiple secondary sources and are properly hedged as allegations. The issues are a Blockonomi archive link that points to an unrelated article (claim_findings[10]), an unsupported statement that the government credited Robinhood's cooperation (claim_findings[7]), a timeline entry describing an arraignment that sources do not show (claim_findings[9]), and an overstated description of Chai's case venue (claim_findings[2]). The high-priority gap, no primary court documents because the DOJ release could not be read, keeps this at revise rather than approve. The reviewer found no omissions and no status contradiction."},"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:29:39.676Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.3,"investigation_id":"625b95a0-5ed1-4c29-8472-146607d4ca9c","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":26,"page_slug":"huaisong-xiang","prev_score":26,"reason":"Of 10 countable claim findings (one source-blocked finding excluded), 1 was disputed and 2 could not be found in sources, giving 30%, the top of the minor band. The core allegations (charges, counts, penalties, alleged trading pattern, employment) were confirmed by multiple secondary sources and are properly hedged as allegations. The issues are a Blockonomi archive link that points to an unrelated article (claim_findings[10]), an unsupported statement that the government credited Robinhood's cooperation (claim_findings[7]), a timeline entry describing an arraignment that sources do not show (claim_findings[9]), and an overstated description of Chai's case venue (claim_findings[2]). The high-priority gap, no primary court documents because the DOJ release could not be read, keeps this at revise rather than approve. The reviewer found no omissions and no status contradiction.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":10,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}