Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Ondo Finance
- Sequence
- #1
- Score
- 68 → 68 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 419515565
- Off-chain at
- 2026-05-13T17:29:32.470Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- PtZtzPVt72cDZqaJMDPjaqu7JDTvVNHU4M2Mb9yEk4y
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1155 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-05-13T17:29:32.347Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"a092ade3-397f-4b42-980b-dabdc8481348","new_score":68,"page_slug":"ondo-finance","prev_score":68,"reason":"The Ondo Finance investigation page is largely accurate on major factual claims: the SEC investigation closure, Oasis Pro acquisition, Ondo Chain announcement, Franklin Templeton partnership, tokenomics, and security audit findings are all well-supported. Key concerns are: (1) the USDY yield range of 3.6-3.75% appears to understate actual 2025 yields by a significant margin and is disputed; (2) the OUSG minimum investment of '$5,000' is likely incorrect (sources consistently indicate $100,000); (3) the 21Shares ETF filing date is stated as 'March 2026' in sections[12] but was February 6, 2026; (4) BlackRock BUIDL's AUM and market share are overstated (~$2.38B/32% vs. the stated ~$2.9B/40%); and (5) a material governance risk — that ~85% of ONDO supply is team-controlled — is absent from the page.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":1,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}