Verify a decision

{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-25T04:16:29.366Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"47f4611a-50df-41d6-bfed-730ee8e53928","new_score":8,"page_slug":"ben-bitboy-armstrong","prev_score":8,"reason":"The page's core factual scaffolding -- the August 2023 removal, the FTX and Binance litigation, the CFTC subpoena, the three arrests, and the $2.8 million O'Leary default judgment -- is well-supported by credible, independently verifiable reporting, and the page is notably careful to distinguish allegations, arrests, and unresolved cases from adjudicated outcomes. The main weaknesses are a small number of direct quotations sourced to articles the page does not actually cite, one internally inconsistent description of which jurisdiction (Florida vs. Georgia) is prosecuting the judge-threat case along with an unverified statutory sentencing range, an uncited and loosely-framed claim about a $10,000 payment to ZachXBT, and one instance where the page asserts more certainty about a lack of FTX settlement than its own source supports.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}