Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Anza
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 74 → 69 (-5)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 423507971
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-01T03:12:27.997Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- J1ji2uE7X6f7tnrpaSwUKY4FeKDyuvRUpCenR81nzYyd
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1363 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-01T03:12:27.767Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"83fa375e-fe5d-4d90-8113-e50091f2a566","new_score":69,"page_slug":"anza","prev_score":74,"reason":"The reviewer confirmed 20 of 30 claims outright and found zero actively disputed claims, yielding a 0% disputed rate. A -5 modifier is applied to reflect a cluster of partially_supported findings that represent material imprecisions: claim_findings[29] (Funding section) incorrectly states Anza has not disclosed its funding source when CEO Jeff Washington publicly confirmed a Solana Foundation grant at launch; claim_findings[12] characterizes Agave 3.0 as 'released to testnet in late 2025' when official release schedule data shows it was recommended for full mainnet deployment in October 2025; and claim_findings[18] overstates Rotor as 'replacing' Turbine when Anza's own documentation frames it as a refinement with Turbine remaining in the initial deployment phases. These inaccuracies are correctible and do not rise to the level of disputed claims warranting a revise verdict, but they reduce overall accuracy confidence. Reviewer confidence was 0.88 and no link rot or stale critical citations were found.","score_delta":-5,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}