Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Mantle
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 48 → 48 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 426514901
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-14T23:16:20.375Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- BoKx8TyYAZKU63e9zwspRPfdFAUiVbG8eo46Md8PipHZ
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1884 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:16:20.308Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"54f4170c-3817-4555-85dc-b8678b640860","new_score":48,"page_slug":"mantle","prev_score":48,"reason":"Blue-chip calibration review (Prompt A). Verdict: over-penalized. Page content is treated as accurate; the trust_score band is miscalibrated. Mantle is a legitimate Ethereum Layer 2 operator (EVM-compatible, OP Stack, ZK validity proofs via OP-Succinct as of September 2025) with $1.32B TVL per L2Beat, $6B+ treasury inherited from BitDAO, multiple professional security audits (OpenZeppelin, Secure3, Sigma Prime, Mixbytes), and zero regulatory actions from SEC, CFTC, or DOJ. The two incidents driving the current WARNING score — the $24M mETH loss in the February 2025 Bybit hack and the April 2026 KelpDAO rsETH $292M exploit — were both caused by third parties (North Korean hackers against Bybit; LayerZero DVN infrastructure compromise against KelpDAO) rather than by Mantle's own fraud or negligence. Mantle in fact responded constructively to the KelpDAO crisis by proposing a 30,000 ETH credit line to Aave DAO, which passed governance. Real and material risks do exist: L2Beat confirms zero-delay contract upgrades (CRITICAL flag), a single centralized sequencer, permissioned proposers, and a 6/14 MantleSecurityMultisig controlling all protocol upgrades — and the Bybit concentration (holding ~60% of original BIT supply) creates ongoing treasury dependency risk. These factors justify a CAUTIONARY band (not WARNING), and a score of approximately 60: legitimate, operational, audited, no fraud, but with non-trivial centralization and key-person/exchange concentration risks that users should understand before depositing funds.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}