Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-27T17:03:43.246Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"e8f8bd4c-f2e4-4cec-8352-7c71d9fd1949","new_score":33,"page_slug":"stars-arena","prev_score":38,"reason":"None of the page's disputed or unverifiable claims involve the core allegations: the review independently confirmed the $2.9M / 266,103 AVAX exploit amount and the ~90% fund-recovery outcome against multiple independent sources, with no overstatement of harm (claim_findings[1], claim_findings[7]). Computed disputed_pct is 6.67% (1 unverifiable of 15 claims, 0 disputed), which on its own sits in the approve band. However, the review flagged a high-priority coverage gap: the page's 'Current Status' section is anchored to June 2025 data and omits that the ARENA token has since fallen roughly 80% further, to about $6-9M market cap (claim_findings[13], coverage_gaps[0]). The platform is still operating, so the page is not falsely describing a defunct project, but presenting 14-month-old figures as the current state is a real defect that a reader would rely on. A high-priority coverage gap of this kind is specifically called out as grounds to move toward review_revise even when disputed_pct is low, so the page is held to a light revision requirement rather than approved outright. Two lesser issues -- a timeline TVL figure not actually supported by its cited source (claim_findings[11]) and a likely placeholder pre-seed funding date (claim_findings[8]) -- reinforce a light-touch revise rather than a heavier penalty.","score_delta":-5,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}