Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-27T05:07:42.523Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"b27480f7-c442-4be5-b018-f74d8851d9c2","new_score":62,"page_slug":"ripple-usd-rlusd","prev_score":74,"reason":"The review confirmed most of the page's core facts — issuer structure, the separation of the NYDFS state trust charter from the later federal OCC approval, the distinction between Deloitte's monthly reserve attestations and a full audit, and the legal split between XRP's institutional and public sales — against primary sources. However, the page materially misstates how the SEC litigation ended: it says Ripple 'paid a $50 million settlement,' but court records show a judge rejected that reduced settlement twice, so the original $125 million penalty and a permanent injunction against unregistered institutional XRP sales remained the actual final judgment (claim_findings[16]). Because this error understates a penalty and omits a standing injunction on a site meant to flag risk, it is weighted as a serious single-item defect even though only 3 of 23 checked claims were disputed or unverifiable overall (about 13%, disputed+unverifiable / total). Two smaller issues were also found: a timeline date for a corporate acquisition off by ten days (claim_findings[21]), and one reserve snapshot that could not be independently reproduced, likely because the source page has since rolled the figure forward rather than because it was wrong (claim_findings[8]).","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}