Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Quant Network
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
68 → 68 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
424157064
Off-chain at
2026-06-04T02:54:23.642Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
DFkJdrab4JT6aCpozH9ACze4DW3SVJexroEPLVgm4R9y
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1035 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-04T02:54:23.521Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"1a8ab90d-615d-437f-911e-9003da98fe20","new_score":68,"page_slug":"quant-network","prev_score":68,"reason":"The Quant Network investigation page is broadly accurate regarding corporate structure, institutional partnerships (RLN, Project Rosalind, GBTD, ECB Digital Euro), and documented scam activity. The main weaknesses are: the BestDapps article cited for token economics claims does not actually contain the ICO figures or burn details stated; the FINMA utility token classification claim has no cited or findable source; the '68% sold at ICO for $11M' conflates the public sale with total multi-round fundraising of approximately $26M; and the CoinTelegraph GBTD source returns 404. Two cited sources (fintechmagazine.com and cointelegraph.com) returned HTTP errors, representing link rot.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}