Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Curve DEX
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 38 → 26 (-12)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 426283257
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-13T21:46:47.792Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 6c3oobhKZAsXyVXaDkcFfHE4FrNDzSFWg7j8bPWBe4mX
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1239 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-13T21:46:47.585Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"3e4567af-0a09-4107-b598-0cddbf8e26fa","new_score":26,"page_slug":"curve-dex","prev_score":38,"reason":"17% of claims (3 of 18) were disputed by the reviewer. Two timeline entries carry incorrect dates: claim_findings[9] places the $1.85M public bounty on August 1, 2023 when Tier 2 sources (Decrypt, CoinTelegraph) confirm it was announced August 6-7 after a deadline expired; claim_findings[11] dates the Alchemix fund return to August 8, 2023 when contemporaneous reporting confirms it occurred August 4-5. claim_findings[14] additionally states OTC selling pushed CRV below $0.40, contradicting the cited Protos source which reports CRV was approximately $0.47 at expiry. These are timeline precision errors rather than disputes of the core narrative. A high-priority coverage gap also flags that all five section content fields are empty strings, leaving the page with no narrative body — this structural incompleteness independently warrants revision regardless of the factual findings.","score_delta":-12,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}