Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Taj Tarsha / Few and Far Limited
- Sequence
- #5
- Score
- 26 → 26 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 457898865
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-17T04:10:31.749Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-17T04:10:57.561Z
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- Aej5Xez43HYVx8Y7tSgmTm2hJusHeMqHiG9gLxy13wkm
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1662 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"bde2a70e7fe5e8fb70b3030570f5d13c","decided_at":"2026-10-17T04:10:31.558Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2857,"findings_hash":"CH46VjDqY1rrkvXMRFAhzTJiUm7fRTaLsF9hoKYjNgmX","investigation_id":"6c69efb6-4853-4cbe-a95d-2e4e49b18bd5","mode":"findings_only","new_score":26,"page_content_hash":"53c76fc9ba1a5c2b191586d8757f74ca5f3623ef00a18e75e7a220aef1ef5459","page_slug":"taj-tarsha-few-and-far-limited","prev_score":26,"reason":"The page's core factual spine — the SDNY indictment, charges, dollar figures, investor count, token count, salary/bonus figures, audit timing, bond terms, and the quoted private messages — is well-supported by the DOJ release and independent Tier 1/2 reporting (Fortune, CoinDesk, OCCRP, The Block, Protos, Cryptopolitan). The one substantive defect is a sourcing error around the FAR token's launch date: the page attributes the March 8, 2024 launch date partly to 'the DOJ release,' but the DOJ release and outlets paraphrasing it (CoinDesk, OCCRP, Decrypt, The Block) consistently report a May 2024 launch — this same misattribution appears in both the prose and the timeline entry's source field. A secondary, minor issue is an unverifiable exact ATH price/date and an unverifiable detail about a 'sophisticated investors' defense argument. No accepted community submissions existed to review. Coverage gaps include the absence of any parallel civil/regulatory action, on-chain forensic evidence, and two orphaned sources in the bibliography.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":5,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}