Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · USD Coin (USDC)
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 78 → 78 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 423949557
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-03T03:57:00.690Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 8BwSBuZBSod1NLbga1VP6p12v7Fks9Ptvko5JZvDXaMF
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1031 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-03T03:57:00.597Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"42bff9bf-0f41-455a-bccf-b76ebe31c89c","new_score":78,"page_slug":"usd-coin","prev_score":78,"reason":"The USDC investigation page is largely accurate and well-sourced, with 21 of 28 claims confirmed by independent sources. The five partially supported claims involve either understated quantitative metrics (16 blockchains vs. current ~34; $20T cumulative volume vs. $31T+ by mid-2025; USDC transaction volume leadership date possibly April not August 2024) or minor characterization gaps (Poloniex ownership end date; Centre Consortium announcement vs. formal dissolution). One claim regarding the NYDFS BitLicense is unverifiable due to absence of any cited source. No claims are directly contradicted by reputable current sources, and no link rot was detected in the primary cited URLs.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}