Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-26T12:10:48.309Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"98749b11-466d-49ba-967e-094583968ae7","new_score":12,"page_slug":"zilliqa-exchange-partner-cold-wallet-hack-july-2026","prev_score":22,"reason":"Of 39 checked claims, none were disputed or unverifiable, and the page's central figures — the theft amount, market impact, and technical root-cause description — were verified almost word-for-word against Zilliqa's own sources. However, five findings (claim_findings[14], [30], [31], [32], [33]) are marked stale: Zilliqa published an official post-mortem on August 20, 2026, six days before this review, that closes questions the page still presents as open, including the identity of the affected exchange (KuCoin), the whereabouts of the stolen funds, and the outlook for recovery, which the post-mortem now calls unlikely. Two coverage gaps rated high priority compound this: the page frames the theft as a single-day July 20 event, while the post-mortem shows the exploitation actually ran undetected from March 4 to July 20, 2026, and the page does not acknowledge a separate page covering the same incident. Because nothing on the page is actually contradicted by evidence — it was accurate when written and has simply been overtaken by a very recent primary-source disclosure the page hasn't yet incorporated — this warrants a light revision request rather than a heavier penalty, an investigation flag, or delisting.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}