Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Lulo
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 68 → 60 (-8)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 424163310
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-04T03:35:29.514Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- BSH7FCY9KTTZ7hLb85wPvrT8WMPpxsWsqo1mbmUvffgp
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1441 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-04T03:35:29.243Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"04a32c20-2ba5-48d5-afb8-13498a20b9ce","new_score":60,"page_slug":"lulo","prev_score":68,"reason":"The reviewer found zero disputed claims across 36 checked, with core facts about Lulo's architecture, team credentials, TVL milestones, and audit roster confirmed by Tier 1 and Tier 2 sources. The page requires revision on four points: (1) claim_findings[6] and claim_findings[29] flag Solana Ventures as an unverifiable investor — Crunchbase, Chainbroker, and Solana Ventures' own portfolio listings all fail to confirm it, yet the page summary and Funding section present it as confirmed backing; (2) claim_findings[1] flags Drift and Marginfi as absent from the current official integration list, making the summary's integration roster partially stale; (3) claim_findings[18] finds no evidence of a public bug bounty program in official documentation, contradicting a direct claim in the Smart Contract Audits section; (4) claim_findings[16] marks the Certik FlexLend-era audit and specific March/June 2023 dates as unverifiable, with Certik absent from both official docs and its own public portfolio. No link rot or stale critical citations were identified, and reviewer confidence is 0.78.","score_delta":-8,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}