Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Sequence
#3
Score
5850 (-8)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
423656069
Off-chain at
2026-06-01T19:32:30.343Z
Anchored at
Block time

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
5Jdk56enAer3sgZvMATtkhUVhj9k5Z9NFdspNnG6Y43k
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1306 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-01T19:32:30.158Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"99a79ffe-a739-45dd-9f2c-24975a8e2f06","new_score":50,"page_slug":"cow-swap-cow-protocol","prev_score":58,"reason":"The page is substantially accurate across 21 of 25 checked claims, with no claims outright disputed by credible sources. Two claims are partially supported and warrant correction: claim_findings[8] states the phishing interface operated for 'approximately 90 minutes,' but multiple Tier 2 sources indicate the phishing redirect remained live until migration to cow.finance at approximately 18:30 UTC — roughly 3.5 hours after onset, not 90 minutes. This figure appears in the summary, sections[1], and sections[3], making it a recurring material inaccuracy about user exposure duration. Claim_findings[24] presents the Legal Defense Reserve replenishment to 5 million USDC as a completed action, whereas CIP-86 states it as a stated intent. One claim about multi-signature domain management and MFA commitments (claim_findings[27]) could not be independently verified. No link rot, stale sources, or high-priority coverage gaps were identified.","score_delta":-8,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}