Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Worldcoin / World
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 33 → 33 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464375119
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T05:19:02.876Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T05:19:21.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T05:19:21.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 8sZQyJv2E3tveJ2zDEzQ1zQ41A6F4q1YNdrxBPA4xYim
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1303 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"1c46699b7a624477e2dd1847eeabec66","decided_at":"2026-11-02T05:19:02.812Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.1818,"findings_hash":"7iXEcuEDAmHQMDNNEfftMWXhLAtdUqzF6eMTtphLpHrH","investigation_id":"b1309bae-c2ff-4821-8ade-9b74941473bd","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":33,"omissions":{"material":2,"total":3},"page_content_hash":"21c3c27d8f4b942b24dc3284ab244caec62ae586ff0a5647b1e46b081eea6104","page_slug":"worldcoin","prev_score":33,"reason":"The core regulatory narrative (Kenya, Spain, Portugal, Hong Kong, Bavaria, Indonesia) is consistent with secondary sources. Weak points are the tokenomics section (allocation split differs from the cited source, and the July 2026 unlock claim is unsupported and now past), the SBF claim (not in the cited source), and omissions of the 2025 Philippines and Thailand orders. Spain and Portugal measures were temporary, so 'banned' slightly overstates them.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}