Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Changpeng Zhao
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 18 → 18 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 426262051
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-13T19:26:28.597Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 48fx2Z6qVJhieisniTCz9qT3v65YGkBSpR4wfRFE3Nzi
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1133 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-13T19:26:28.429Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"8e9faaa2-e84c-4e35-af62-8549b942e841","new_score":18,"page_slug":"changpeng-zhao","prev_score":18,"reason":"The page's core factual record — guilty plea, settlement amount, sentencing, incarceration dates, pardon, Hamas lawsuit, and the 2026 Fortune/DOJ investigation — is well-supported by Tier 1 and Tier 2 sources. The most significant problems are: (1) an internal contradiction on Zhao's birth date (summary says February 10, timeline says February 5, and neither is corroborated by authoritative sources); (2) the personal fine is understated at $50M when the CFTC separately imposed $150M in civil penalties; and (3) all section content fields are empty, meaning the page is effectively a summary-and-timeline stub without narrative elaboration. The cited source URLs are plausible and point to real outlets, though several could not be fetched directly due to paywalls or 403 errors.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}