Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T19:08:15.666Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"c0a944e8-60f1-42fe-b549-679cca818ac3","new_score":4,"page_slug":"ashcrypto-roya-token-pump-and-dump","prev_score":18,"reason":"The page's core factual scaffolding holds up: the reviewer confirmed ZachXBT's specific quotes, the AshWSB WhatsApp channel identity, ROYA's price and IDO history, and the token's contract address (claim_findings[1], [2], [3], [10], [11], [12]), and the page is upfront that there has been no independent on-chain corroboration, no regulatory action, and no public response from Ashcrypto (claim_findings[4], [8], [9]) — that candor about the case's limits counts in its favor. Two problems keep this page from clean approval. First, the title and entity name state 'ROYA Token Pump-and-Dump' as settled fact, while the body text and every cited source treat it strictly as an allegation from a single on-chain investigator with no independent corroboration, regulatory finding, or admission (claim_findings[0]) — a title is what most readers actually see, and hedged body prose several paragraphs down does not fix that. Second, the citation offered as proof that Yahoo Finance covered this story instead links to an unrelated pump-and-dump case involving different people and a different token (claim_findings[7], disputed), and the page's RAVE-token statistics disagree even between its own two cited sources (claim_findings[6]). None of this undermines the well-corroborated core reporting, but the title's unqualified framing of a serious, unproven accusation against a named person, combined with a mismatched citation, requires correction before the page can stand as approved.","score_delta":-14,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}